French/Indian Wars – Queen Anne’s War

Queen Anne’s War (1702–1713): Europe Spills over into America

Queen Anne’s War, the North American theatre of the War of the Spanish Succession (1702–1713), was a conflict that entangled European powers in a sprawling battle for dominance over trade, territory, and influence. Within this grand narrative, the Battle of Port Royal in 1710 marked a pivotal moment, demonstrating the military ambition and strategic importance of North America’s Atlantic frontier. Like all wars of the period, it was a complex tapestry of political manoeuvring, human suffering, and ultimate transformation of the geopolitical landscape.


Political Situation at the Outset

The dawn of Queen Anne’s War found England and France locked in yet another chapter of their enduring rivalry. Following the death of Spain’s Charles II in 1700, European alliances were realigned as claims to the Spanish throne created a dangerous power vacuum. France backed Philip of Anjou, while England, the Dutch Republic, and the Holy Roman Empire supported Charles of Austria. The War of the Spanish Succession ignited in Europe, but its flames soon spread across the Atlantic to the contested territories of North America.

In North America, the competing colonial ambitions of Britain and France were already a simmering source of tension. The French sought to consolidate their hold over Canada (New France), Louisiana, and the interior regions, maintaining alliances with Indigenous nations. The British colonies, particularly New England, viewed the French presence in Acadia (modern Nova Scotia) as a direct threat to their security and trade ambitions. The political chessboard was set, and hostilities seemed inevitable.

Historian Fred Anderson emphasizes that “this war was never solely about Europe; it was about securing the economic lifelines of empire.” The stakes for both sides were enormous, as control of the Atlantic seaboard offered unmatched strategic advantages.


Causes of the Outbreak of Hostilities

The immediate trigger for conflict in North America lay in the ambitions of the British and French to dominate the lucrative fur trade and secure Indigenous alliances. French raids on New England settlements, such as the infamous Deerfield Raid of 1704, inflamed tensions. Additionally, Acadia served as a critical foothold for the French to control access to the Saint Lawrence River and maintain their naval presence in the Atlantic.

On the British side, there was a strong push to secure territorial expansion for New England. Queen Anne’s ascension to the throne in 1702 provided political impetus, as England sought to assert its dominance under her rule.

John Grenier, in The Far Reaches of Empire, notes, “The escalating raids and counter-raids in Acadia and New England were not sporadic, isolated incidents; they reflected a broader contest for imperial supremacy that was both inevitable and bloody.”


Military Aspects and Battles

The Battle of Port Royal (1710): Prelude and Strategy

Port Royal, the fortified heart of Acadia, was a persistent thorn in Britain’s side. Its strategic location on the Annapolis River provided the French with a base to disrupt British shipping and launch raids into New England. The British had previously attempted to capture Port Royal in 1707 but failed due to poor coordination and inadequate siege equipment.

By 1710, however, Britain was determined to succeed. Colonel Francis Nicholson, an experienced military leader, led a well-prepared force of approximately 2,000 British soldiers and New England militia, supported by a fleet of Royal Navy ships under the command of Commodore George Martin. French forces under Governor Daniel d’Auger de Subercase were ill-equipped and outnumbered, with fewer than 300 defenders at their disposal.

The Siege

The British expedition landed on the shores near Port Royal in October 1710. Utilizing heavy artillery, Nicholson’s forces began a systematic bombardment of the French fortifications. Subercase’s defenders put up a spirited resistance, but their supplies and morale dwindled as the siege dragged on. After eight days of bombardment, Subercase surrendered on October 13, 1710.

Historian William C. Wicken observes that “the fall of Port Royal was not just a military conquest but a psychological blow to the French presence in Acadia.” The victory marked a turning point in the struggle for dominance in the region.


Results of the Battles

The capture of Port Royal had profound consequences. The British renamed the settlement Annapolis Royal in honour of Queen Anne and solidified their control over Acadia. The victory paved the way for the Treaty of Utrecht (1713), which formally ceded Acadia to Britain and reshaped the territorial boundaries in North America.

The French, however, retained Cape Breton Island and established the fortress of Louisbourg, maintaining a foothold in the region and setting the stage for future conflicts.


Resultant Outcome of the Conflict

The broader implications of Queen Anne’s War were felt across North America and Europe. The Treaty of Utrecht ended the conflict, granting Britain not only Acadia but also Newfoundland and the Hudson Bay territory. However, tensions persisted, as neither side viewed the treaty as a permanent settlement.

Indigenous nations, who had been drawn into the war by both sides, suffered devastating consequences. The balance of power among Indigenous communities shifted as alliances with European powers unraveled.

Bruce G. Trigger, a noted scholar of Indigenous history, remarks, “For Indigenous peoples, Queen Anne’s War was a harbinger of more destructive conflicts to come, as European expansionism showed no signs of abating.”


Military Units and Commanders

  • British Forces:
    • Commander: Colonel Francis Nicholson
    • Naval Support: Commodore George Martin
    • Composition: Regular British troops, New England militia, and naval units
  • French Forces:
    • Commander: Governor Daniel d’Auger de Subercase
    • Composition: French regulars, Acadian militia, and Indigenous allies

The disparity in resources and preparation was evident, as the British brought superior numbers and siege artillery to bear, overwhelming the French defenders.


Conclusion

Queen Anne’s War, and particularly the Battle of Port Royal, exemplified the brutal and transformative nature of early colonial conflicts. It was a war not just of armies but of empires, ideologies, and survival. The fall of Port Royal symbolized the rising tide of British power in North America and the beginning of the end for French ambitions in the region.

As historian Fred Anderson succinctly puts it, “The wars of empire in North America were always about more than borders; they were about shaping the destinies of continents.”


References

  1. Anderson, Fred. Crucible of War: The Seven Years’ War and the Fate of Empire in British North America, 1754-1766. New York: Vintage Books, 2000.
  2. Grenier, John. The Far Reaches of Empire: War in Nova Scotia, 1710-1760. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press, 2008.
  3. Wicken, William C. Mi’kmaq Treaties on Trial: History, Land, and Donald Marshall Junior. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002.
  4. Trigger, Bruce G. Natives and Newcomers: Canada’s “Heroic Age” Reconsidered. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 1985.